We help small teams run clinical supply like large ones.

Veridose is a decision layer for clinical trial supply. It connects your IRT, ERP, CDMOs, depots and couriers, recomputes the plan when the trial changes, sends agents to do the chasing, and leaves every decision with your supply manager.

  • ~$500K

    in potential sales lost per day of delay for drugs that reach market, plus about $40K a day in direct trial costs.Tufts CSDD, 2024 · source

  • ~50%

    median waste of investigational product kits across ten benchmarked companies.McKinsey, 2021 · source

  • 77%

    of Phase II protocols had a substantial amendment, 2.2 on average.Tufts CSDD, 2016 · source

  • 28%

    chance a Phase II asset advances to Phase III. Supply shouldn't be what holds it back.Citeline, 2014–2023 · source

Where clinical supply breaks down

Emerging biopharma companies started 68% of trials in 2025, up from 56% in 2019. Many run supply with a small team that keeps drug moving to dozens of sites through several CDMOs, depots, couriers and an outsourced IRT.IQVIA, 2026 · source

  • Forecasts built by hand

    Spreadsheets cover uncertain enrollment with blanket overage, so drug expires on the shelf or runs out at a site.

  • Amendments that break the plan

    A new cohort or country can change demand, batches, labels, IRT settings and import routes at once. The plan is rebuilt over days of email.

  • Status chased vendor by vendor

    Courier portals, depot emails and CDMO calls take the week that should go to decisions.

  • Documents that drift apart

    The same storage, shelf-life and label facts are retyped into the IMPD, pharmacy manual, IRT specification and label proofs.

What Veridose does

One record of the trial, with forecasting models, agents and language models working on it, and a named, authorized person approving every change.

  • Forecasts tuned to your trial

    In-house simulation and optimization models are configured to your protocol, enrollment and visit schedule. They show the range of likely demand, and every assumption can be edited.

  • Amendment impact, fast

    Veridose will read the change, recompute the plan, trace the effects on manufacturing, labels, IRT and import, and present costed options for the supply manager to choose from.

  • Agents that do the chasing

    They query CDMOs, depots, couriers and sites, follow up when answers are late, check weather and holidays on each lane, and bring back only what needs a decision.

  • Answers for every role

    Updates tailored to the study team, scientists and executives, plus an assistant anyone can ask. Answers cite their sources, respect permissions and are built to protect the blind.

  • Documents and records

    Supply sections of the IMPD, pharmacy manual, IRT specification and labels are drafted from one record, inconsistencies are flagged, and each draft goes to its owner. Every change is designed to be logged to 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 audit-trail expectations.

What it's worth

Better supply decisions help the patients in the trial, the people running it, and the budget behind it. Until our pilots report, the figures below are industry benchmarks, not Veridose results.

For the trial and its people

  • PatientsTheir dose is at the site on the day of their visit, not held up by a stockout or a customs delay.
  • SitesCoordinators confirm stock in a minute and get resupplied before they run low.
  • Supply managersLess time chasing vendors and rebuilding spreadsheets, more time on decisions, with every call documented.
  • Scientists and study leadsAnswers on cohort and country readiness when they ask, without waiting for a status meeting or breaking the blind.
  • Executives and QAOne view of timeline risk and spend, and an audit trail built for inspection.

For the budget

  • 15–20%

    lower clinical supply costs when supply planning reaches best-in-class, mostly from wasting less drug.McKinsey, 2021 · source

  • ~$40K

    in direct costs for each day a trial runs late. Catching a stockout or import hold early can save some of these days.Tufts CSDD, 2024 · source

  • $141K

    median cost to implement one Phase II substantial amendment. Trials with one ran about three months longer than those without.Tufts CSDD, 2016 · source

Example: one Phase II trial with a $4M supply budget

Supply costs 15% lower$600K
Two weeks of delay avoided (14 days × $23.7K, Phase II average)$332K
Half the implementation cost of one amendment$70K
Potential saving~$1.0M

Illustrative. The savings rate and days avoided are assumptions, not results. Gross figures, before implementation costs; categories may overlap. A pilot measures them against your own baseline.

How it works

Veridose sits above the systems you already use. It reads from them, works on one record of the trial, and writes approved changes back.

Approved changes go back to the IRT, CDMOs and depots through MCP and standard APIs. Nothing is committed without approval.

Each task goes to the model suited to it, open or frontier, hosted in region under a BAA. MCP became a shared standard under the Linux Foundation’s Agentic AI Foundation in December 2025 (source).

One trial, three views

Everyone works from the same record. Each role sees what it needs first.

Decisions waiting, the forecast against supply, stock by location, and what agents did overnight.Illustrative
Progress by cohort and country, with treatment-arm data restricted and an assistant that answers from the live record.Illustrative
Milestones, top risks, spend against budget, and the approvals that need you.Illustrative
View

How we're different

Works across vendors

IRT and platform vendors announced AI agents in 2025–26, built around their own platforms. Veridose is vendor-neutral by design: one decision layer across IRT, CDMOs, depots and couriers, where the supply decisions actually sit.Suvoda · Veeva · IQVIA

Math sets the numbers

Forecasts, buffers and overage come from fixed, versioned models, validated before each release. We take a conservative reading of draft EU GMP Annex 22, which limits AI in critical GMP applications to static models; EMA is still refining that scope. Language models explain the numbers; they don't produce them.European Pharmaceutical Review

A person makes every call

Agents ask, check, draft and flag. Routine resupply runs within rules a person has approved; booking an unplanned shipment, ordering a batch, releasing stock and changing IRT settings each need a named approval.

Built to be adjusted

Supply managers asked for this: edit assumptions, override a recommendation with the reason logged, and run your own what-ifs.

How we partner

Start small on one trial, then choose where Veridose runs.

How we start

Design partner

Bring a live or recent trial, shape the product with us, and decide which integrations come first.

Pilot

One trial, with scope agreed up front. We measure drug waste, days of delay avoided and hours saved against your own baseline.

How it runs

Managed

We host and operate Veridose in region under a BAA, and ship validated releases.

In your environment

Deployed in your own cloud account, so trial data never leaves it.

Configured with your team

We tune models and scenarios to your trials together. Your team owns the assumptions; we own the models and their validation.

AI recommends. An authorized person approves.

Clinical supply affects patients, so it's regulated. In April 2026, FDA issued a warning letter to a manufacturer for relying on AI-generated cGMP documents without review by its quality unit. These commitments shape the design from the start.FDA · source

What we don't claim yet: no validated deployments, no security certifications and no named integrations. We say "designed for Part 11", not "Part 11 compliant", because compliance is established with each customer.

  • Human approval is explicit and loggedEvery committed action is attributed to a named person.
  • Fixed, versioned models where GMP is involvedValidated before each release; nothing retrains silently.
  • A stated use and risk tier per capabilityFollowing FDA's draft guidance on AI in drug development.
  • Minimal patient data, kept in regionRemoved or tokenized on entry, and aligned with ICH E6(R3), HIPAA and GDPR.

Build it with us

We're raising a seed round to build amendment impact analysis, and looking for supply teams to shape it.

Or email partners@veridosebio.com, investors@veridosebio.com or hello@veridosebio.com. We reply within a week.

Message received.Thank you. We'll reply within a week.
A few sentences is plenty.

We use your details only to reply. See our privacy policy.